Omnivore or Herbivore?

As humans, we usually take for granted the idea that we can eat just about anything, and therefore we are omnivores.

However, when you compare the teeth and digestive systems carnivores, omnivores, and herbivores, what emerges is the truth that, anatomically and physiologically, we share little in common with carnivores and omnivores, and that we in fact have the classic characteristics of herbivores.

In this post we will delve deep into the controversial topic of herbivore vs. omnivore.

But first, let’s examine what herbivores, omnivores, and carnivores are. Because I don’t recall hearing discussions about what these terms meant growing up. The first time the word “herbivore” began to have any meaning for me was right after I became vegan and I learned that humans’ anatomy was actually perfectly suited to eating plants, and ill-suited to consuming animal flesh and secretions.

Carnivores are animals that get all of their nutrients and calories from consuming the flesh of other animals. Some examples of carnivorous animals include lions, tigers, cougars, foxes, coyotes, hawks, vultures, whales, sharks, and dolphins.

Omnivores are animals that get their nourishment from both plant and animal sources. Some examples of omnivores are bears, dogs, pigs, raccoons, badgers, opossums, rats, mice, crows, swans, and seagulls.

Herbivores are animals that are evolved to eat plant foods as their primary source of nutrients and calories. Some examples are elephants, rhinos, giraffes, hippos, rhinoceroses, horses, deer, sheep, koalas, cockatoos, mackaws, and parakeets, and parrots.

Primates – our closest relatives in the animal kingdom – also fall under this category. Gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees, and bonobos eat plants 95-99% of the time, the rest being termites or other insects.

There are many charts circulating on the internet comparing the physical characteristics of carnivores, omnivores, and herbivores, and they all essentially convey the same paradigm-shattering idea: that humans are not omnivores, but herbivores. Here is one from Dr. Milton Mill’s paper The Comparative Anatomy of Eating. And by the way, he has a great presentation available on YouTube in which he explains these differences.

As you can see in this chart there are lots of major differences between ourselves as humans and omnivores / carnivores. Here are some of the major ones:

Hands

  • Carnivores and omnivores have paws with claws – which anyone who’s ever been scratched by a dog or cat knows can be quite sharp. These sharp claws enable them to dig into and capture their prey easily.
  • Like primates (herbivores), we humans have hands that are conducive to plucking vegetables and fruits.

Mouths

  • Carnivores and omnivores have a large mouth opening relative to the size of the rest of their head. Their jaw joint location is located on the molar plane (i.e. aligned with their teeth).
  • Herbivores and humans have a small mouth opening relative to the size of the rest of our heads. Our jaw joint location is above the molar plane [i.e. above our teeth].

Teeth

Mammals have a few distinct kinds of teeth: canines, incisors, and molars. Here are the characteristics and differences:

Canines

  • Carnivores and omnivores have canine teeth that are long, sharp, and curved.
  • Herbivores’ and our canine teeth are short and blunted.

Incisors

  • Carnivores and omnivores have incisors that are short and pointed.
  • Herbivores and our incisors are broad, flattened, and spade-shaped.

Molars

  • Carnivores and omnivores have molars that are sharp, jagged, and blade-like.
  • Herbivores’ and our molars are flattened with cusps.
Image Source: Dr. Smilez

Chewing

  • Carnivores and omnivores have a jaw that moves up and down in a shearing motion, and does not have the ability to move side to side. They can swallow their food whole.
  • When herbivores and humans eat, our teeth move back and forth in a lateral (side to side) motion that allows us to crush and grind our food. Unlike carnivores and omnivores, we must extensively chew our food before swallowing.

Stomach acidity

  • On a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being acidic, and 10 being alkaline, carnivores and omnivores’ stomachs have a pH of less than 1 when they have food in it. This allows their bodies to break down the decaying (and rotting) flesh as fast as possible.
  • Herbivores and humans, on other hand have a stomach pH of 4 to 5 with food in it.

Enzymes

  • Carnivores and omnivores have an enzyme called uricase that help them to break down the uric acid that consuming meat creates in their bodies. Humans do not have uricase, which is why eating meat causes excess acid in our bodies.
  • Herbivores and humans have carbohydrate digesting enzymes, which allows us to assimilate the nutrients from plant foods. Omnivores and carnivores do not have carbohydrate digesting enzymes.

Small intestine

  • The small intestine of carnivores and omnivores is 3-6 times their body length.
  • The small intestine of herbivores is 10-12+ times their body length. Our small intestines are 10-11 times our body length.

There are many, many more distinctions demonstrating that humans are natural herbivores. These are just some of the more obvious ones. I would recommend checking out the videos I include at the end to learn more about these in depth.

Meat did not make us smart

We do have evidence that primitive man, being opportunistic, ate some meat. But as biological anthropologist Dr. Nathaniel Dominy explains in an interview, meat was such an unreliable source of food for humans that it did not constitute a significant part of our diets until recently. Therefore, the possibility that meat played a role in the massive quantum shift in human brain evolution is slim at best. We know this because humans still retain the anatomy and physiological characteristics of herbivores.

Thus the not-so-novel insight, which our culture is *finally* starting to grasp, that that the heavy consumption of animal products in lieu of vegetables is causing serious harm to our bodies. 

So if we’re not designed to consume animal flesh, what is the effect that our heavy consumption of meat having on our bodies?

Essentially, the effect is a travesty of epic proportions that can be summed up in the word “disease.”

Specifically, “diseases of affluence” or “Western diseases / diseases of the West.” These health problems are referred to as such because they were virtually nonexistent prior to the late 19th century when humans in modern, industrialized countries switched from a plant based diet to an animal-based diet.

Dr. Michael Greger of NutritionFacts.org explains that diseases of affluence aren’t normal or inevitable – they are the result of switching from a mainly vegan diet to a diet rich in animal foods:

“To find a population nearly free of chronic disease in old age, we don’t have to go back a million years. In the 20th century, networks of missionary hospitals in rural Africa found coronary artery disease virtually absent, and not just heart disease, but high blood pressure, stroke, diabetes, common cancers, and more. In a sense, these populations in rural China and Africa were eating the type of diet we’ve been eating for 90% of the last 20 million years, a diet almost exclusively of plant foods.”

The fact that African people did not have the same sorts of health issues we see in the West corroborates Dr. T. Colin Campbell’s findings which he published in The China Study. Starting in the early 70s, Dr. Campbell took part in the China-Cornell-Oxford Project in China, the largest and most comprehensive nutrition study ever undertaken, over the course of 20 years.

In the study, they compared the health markers for people living in the city areas of China, to those living in rural diets. Those living in the urban centers had the resources to consume a more Western diet, heavy in meat and dairy. Those living in rural areas, on the other hand, only had access to vegetables and grains for the most part.

The findings revealed that the people in the rural areas, consuming a mainly plant-based diet, did not suffer from chronic degenerative diseases. By contrast, the people living in cities had the same health issues – heart disease, cancer, and so on – that Americans had.

Dr. Campbell’s research should have been hailed as nutritional and medical breakthrough, but it was so subversive to the status quo that he was exiled by the medical community.

Still, the pharmaceutical-medical complex’s efforts to discredit his work did not hinder Dr. Campbell’s commitment to educating people about the truth. In addition to continuously speaking around the country and abroad, Dr. Campbell has been featured in several documentaries, and stars in the documentary Forks Over Knives.

Food in rural communities

Why is it that made people in Asian and African rural communities, up until recently, lived longer?

A good way to think about it is to consider how markedly different ethnic food restaurants are from typical American fare (hamburgers, pizza, ice cream).

“Ethnic” food: Mexican, Chinese, Japanese, Asian, Thai, Ethiopian, and Indian, to name a few kinds, is mainly plant-based. This is why there are always so much more options for vegans at these kinds of restaurants than at regular restaurants, where there are usually none.

From some of my vegan eating adventures in NY: Bunna (Ethopian), Franchia (Korean), and Hanna (Japanese)

In these cultures, their diet consisted mostly of vegetables, herbs, beans, and grains up until very recently. Meat, if consumed, was used sparingly or on special occasions.

In Europe prior to the 19th century, the dishes may not have been as flavorful and interesting, but it was primarily plant-based all the same. Think of borsht (beet soup) in Russia, ratatouille (stewed vegetables) in France, colcannon (mashed potatoes with kale or cabbage) in Ireland, spaghetti with tomato sauce in Italy, and hummus and pita bread in Greece.

It’s true that people did not live as long. Women often died in childbirth, many children didn’t live past age 5, we didn’t have the cures for infectious diseases we now have, and we didn’t have as much sanitization. On top of that, life was just much more difficult for a variety of reasons.

That said, while people were alive they did not have the same chronic, degenerative diseases that we now see today.

Let’s break down some of the main ways animal flesh negatively affects our health:

Makes the body acidic

Animal products are acidic. The human body needs to maintain a slightly alkaline pH of about 7 to function optimally. When we consume too much acid, our body needs to find a way to neutralize it – so it often pulls calcium and phosphorous from the bones, leading to osteoporosis.

Causes clogged arteries

Clogged arteries or atherosclerosis is really a term to describe the buildup of plaque inside the coronary arteries,  restricting blood flow. This accumulation of plaque comes primarily from cholesterol and saturated fat. Plant foods have zero cholesterol and very little saturated fat. 

Increases bad cholesterol

The average cholesterol level in the US is 210, but the average cholesterol level of vegans in the US in 135. And if you have a cholesterol level below 150, you’re basically considered heart-attack proof. Humans do not need to consume cholesterol because we make our own. What’s referred to as “good cholesterol” is actually just the cholesterol that we ourselves make.

Increases risk of heart attack

Having personally known many people who have perished from heart disease, it pains me to say this, but it is the truth: there is nothing sudden about heart attacks. Heart attacks are the direct result of consuming the standard American diet (SAD) over long periods of time, leading to blockages in the coronary arteries. The average American man or woman is at greater than 50% risk for a heart attack, while a vegan has less than a 5% risk for getting one.

Many doctors such as Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn, former chair of the Cleveland Clinic and author of Prevent and Cure Heart Disease, have proven that heart disease can be reversed when we adopt a plant-based diet. Whereas right now, heart disease a.k.a. clogged arteries kills 7 million people per year or 1 person every 4 seconds, heart disease would be virtually nonexistent in a vegan world.

The negative effects of consuming an animal-laden diet do not stop here. Because when we eat animal products instead of plant foods, we miss out on all the good stuff.

What you’re missing when you don’t consume a plant-based diet

Fiber

Plant foods have fiber; animal product do not. Unlike omnivores and carnivores, herbivores and humans have very long intestines. We need fiber to clean and basically scrub the walls of our small intestine which is long and sacculated. Our small intestines have finger-like hairs called villi, which help to absorb nutrients and give it the overall surface area of a tennis court. But when animal products are consumed, a fatty film builds up on the walls on our small intestine and our colon. Over time, this fatty film becomes thick, and our small intestine can’t properly absorb nutrients. Our colon, also coated in this fatty film, becomes a breeding ground for disease, and can potentially facilitate the growth of cancer.

Phytochemicals and antioxidants

Plant foods are rich in phytochemicals and antioxidants; animal products aren’t. Phytochemicals (chemicals in plants) and antioxidants in particular neutralize the free radicals in our bodies, which can weaken our body and immune system. Dr. Richard Cutler, the former director of Anti-Aging Research at the National Institute of Health, says, “The amount of antioxidants we maintain in the tissues of our bodies is directly proportional to how long we will live.” If we eat meat and dairy instead of plants, we ensure that we won’t be reaping all the benefits of an antioxidant-rich diet that could increase our vitality and longevity.

Ideal fuel = ideal weight

Our bodies know the exact, precise weight our bodies need to be at to function at an optimal level. However, it doesn’t know what to make of fuel we put into ourselves that are not compatible with our physiology. So if we’re eating something we shouldn’t have been eating in the first place, our bodies can’t tell us “stop now” or “that’s enough.” What’s more, our bodies are continually in a state of micronutrient-deprivation, so we feel the urge to constantly eat.

When we consume whole plant foods, on the other hand, our digestive systems get to work with the fuel they know best: fiber and phytonutrients. Provided that what you’re eating is not processed or sugar-laden, your body will signal to you when it’s had enough. Additionally, you will feel simultaneously more satisfied and energized afterwards because you will have given your body its ideal fuel.

One thing I started to grasp almost immediately after going vegan, without knowing much about nutrition at the time, is that plant foods get metabolized much differently than animal products.

As someone with a small frame (I’m 5’3”), I always felt limited by how much I could eat without putting on extra pounds. But after I became vegan, I found myself eating a lot more in terms of volume and quantity, and yet losing weight at the same time. Now, I eat when I want, as much as I want, and how I want. It’s awesome!

In between meals, I don’t find myself craving food even though I’m not technically hungry the way I did before I became vegan. I know when I’m hungry because I feel genuine hunger in my stomach and throat, which is actually a good sensation. When eating a meal, my body tells me exactly when to stop. It also tells me what to eat! This sort of intuitive eating only became possible for me after becoming vegan, and since then maintaining my ideal weight has been a complete non-issue.

If I had thought back in the day that it would be possible to be at my ideal weight while eating as much as I wanted when I wanted and truly savoring meals, I would have thought it was too good to be true. But this is actually how food is meant to be enjoyed, and how our bodies are designed to function.

What about genetics?

Contrary to what mainstream medicine would have you believe, most diseases are not determined by genetics – they are mainly determined by diet and lifestyle.

This is the contention of many doctors advocating a plant-based diet including Dr. T. Colin Campbell, Dr. Joel Furhman, Dr. Michael Greger, Dr. John MacDougall, Dr. Dean Ornish, and Dr. Neal Barnard, who strongly believe we need to switch from a pharmaceutical-centered healthcare system to a nutrition-centered healthcare system. In the documentary Forks Over Knives, Dr. T. Colin Campbell hypothesizes that we would cut healthcare costs by 70 to 80% if everyone were to adopt a plant-based diet.

Unfortunately, there are many vested interests at stake which make promoting plant-based nutrition difficult. The pharmaceutical industry, health insurance companies, and hospitals benefit financially from the model of treating disease symptoms. As corrupt as it may seem, sick people are big business. This isn’t the fault of individuals per se, but an inevitable consequence of the fact that corporations have only one obligation, which is to improve their bottom line. And because a radical shift towards preventative medicine would annihilate their business model, the pharmaceutical-medical complex will do whatever they can to keep things the way they are.

Nonetheless, a good portion of doctors prioritize patient health over their perception of job security. And as they see the benefits and potential of plant-based nutrition, many doctors are paving their own path, one that is separate from the rigid dogma of the current medical system.

Relating to the herbivore vs. omnivore debate, here are some salient quotes from such doctors:

“When we kill animals to eat them, they end up killing us because their flesh, which contains cholesterol and saturated fat, was never intended for human beings, who are natural herbivores ” – William Clifford Roberts, MD, Editor-in-Chief of the American Journal of Cardiology:

“As the editor-in-chief of the American Journal of Cardiology noted 25 years ago, no matter how much fat and cholesterol carnivores eat, they do not develop atherosclerosis [hardening of the arteries]. Conversely, within months a fraction of that cholesterol can start clogging the arteries of animals adapted to eating a more plant-based diet” – Michael Greger, MD

Note: this is why using dogs in studies about heart disease never work! And yet, doctors and scientists have perseverated with this inane line of questioning.

“Human beings have the gastrointestinal tract structure of a “committed” herbivore. Humankind does not show the mixed structural features one expects and finds in anatomical omnivores such as bears and raccoons. Thus, from comparing the gastrointestinal tract of humans to that of carnivores, herbivores and omnivores we must conclude that humankind’s GI tract is designed for a purely plant-food diet.” – Milton Mills, MD

“People are natural herbivores just like every other great ape. Like it or not, we are not dogs or cats. We are great apes, and the foods that are natural to us are those we can pick with our hands” – Neal Barnard, MD

“Findings now show that virtually all people when submitted to a whole food, plant-based (WFPB) diet greatly improve their health. How can they respond in this way if their bodies were meant to consume an animal-based diet?” – T. Colin Campbell, PhD

“Because there is not a very strong match between meat consumption and gradual increases in brain size, scientists have looked to other options. And given that plant foods are such an important part of modern humans that hunted and gathered foods, the money is on plant foods and a shift in the kinds of plant foods as being the major driving factor in increasing brain size” –  Nathaniel Dominy, PhD

Other things to consider

  • Raw animal flesh, organs, intestines, and blood are aversive to most humans. Yet, this is how actual carnivores and omnivores eat their prey.
  • Even if we did want to eat that delicious raw animal flesh, we wouldn’t be able to kill the animal without implements.
  • When we encounter an animal in the wild, our instincts are not to go up to it, attack it, and eat it.
  • On the other hand, we are naturally attracted to vibrant vegetables and fruit.

Finally, I find it interesting that the bible explicitly says that we are meant to be herbivores on page 1:

In the Garden of Eden, God said to Adam and Eve: “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.”

Image Source: Thriving Family

This is not to say that I necessarily believe in everything the bible says. But I do personally suspect that the hidden allegory behind ­Adam and Eve’s expulsion from the Garden of Eden is that everything began to fall apart when they started eating animal flesh. There is actually a book on this called The Real Forbidden Fruit by Jeff Popick. It explains that the term for fruit in Greek, one of the original languages of the bible was written in actually can mean food in general, including meat.

In his book, Popick also notes that in the 10 Commandments as conveyed to Moses, God said, “Thou shalt not kill.” Not “thou shalt not kill humans” or “thou shalt not kill, except for animals,” but “thou shalt not kill, [period].”

I do not consider myself to be a religious person but I do think that the bible is infused with truths drawn from the collective unconscious – whether intentionally or unintentionally.

All you have to do to look at consuming animal flesh and their secretions as the driving cause behind all of the world’s problems is to look at the devastation it causes to animals (obviously), but also to our physical health, as well as our mental and spiritual well-being, and to the environment.

Conclusion

People can deny that humans are herbivores, but from what I intuitively sense, it seems that the reason people are so vehemently opposed to the concept of humans not being omnivores is not that they feel the need to uphold the truth, but that they feel the need to defend their eating habits. I believe that it is their emotional attachment to eating animal products, their resistance to change, and the natural sense of guilt and discomfort they feel about the harm they are causing, that elicits such a strong, knee jerk reaction from them.

But as the Buddha said: “Three things cannot long be hidden: The sun, the moon, and the truth.”

The truth is staring us in the face. We can see it in terms of how consuming animals destroys our health, and how it destroys the environment. We may not literally be able to see the suffering of animals, because factory farming is carried out in secrecy, but it is there all the same, every time we eat animal products and consume the vibrations of pain and suffering.

Even if we do not want to acknowledge the truth, it is still there. The only question is when will we stop running from it?

I leave you with some excellent videos by esteemed doctors and researchers that further illustrate the matter of humans being herbivores.

Videos

Are humans designed to eat meat? Milton Mills, MD

The true human diet – Nathaniel Dominy, PhD

Food that kills – Dr. Michael Klaper, MD

Natasha Sherman interviews Joel Furhman, MD Part 1

Natasha Sherman interviews Joel Furhman, MD Part 2

Making heart attacks history – Caldwell Esselsyten, MD

Food as medicine: preventing and treating the most common diseases with diet – Michael Greger, MD

Resolving the healthcare crisis – T. Colin Campbell, MD

Humans are herbivores – William Clifford Roberts, MD, part 1/2

Humans are herbivores – William Clifford Roberts, MD, part 2/2

Dean Ornish, MD at TEDxSF

Documentaries

And if you haven’t already, be sure to watch the documentaries Eating and Forks Over Knives. Those are the two main ones I recommend, but there are many others including PlantPure Nation, Food Choices, and Eating You Alive.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookPin on Pinterest

One thought on “Omnivore or Herbivore?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *